From ca2a5c012267c500d9f0fd883c98904d125a64f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Benjamin J. Culkin" <bjculkin@mix.wvu.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 13:03:39 -0300
Subject: Refactor tapes

DoubleSided is now its own interface, and the unnecessary tape classes
have been removed
---
 base/src/main/java/bjc/utils/esodata/SingleTape.java | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

(limited to 'base/src/main/java/bjc/utils/esodata/SingleTape.java')

diff --git a/base/src/main/java/bjc/utils/esodata/SingleTape.java b/base/src/main/java/bjc/utils/esodata/SingleTape.java
index 287f22d..636c04c 100644
--- a/base/src/main/java/bjc/utils/esodata/SingleTape.java
+++ b/base/src/main/java/bjc/utils/esodata/SingleTape.java
@@ -20,11 +20,6 @@ import java.util.ArrayList;
  * @author bjculkin
  */
 public class SingleTape<T> implements Tape<T> {
-	/*
-	 * @NOTE Does this stuff still need to be protected? We're not trying to
-	 * use inheritance to implement tape types any more, so I don't see any
-	 * reason to not have it be private.
-	 */
 	/* Our backing store. */
 	protected ArrayList<T> backing;
 	/* Our position in the list. */
@@ -168,11 +163,6 @@ public class SingleTape<T> implements Tape<T> {
 		return true;
 	}
 
-	@Override
-	public boolean isDoubleSided() {
-		return false;
-	}
-
 	@Override
 	public int hashCode() {
 		final int prime = 31;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3