From f51f6da7319787348c38b875652b5c0e9f88c8aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Culkin <scorpress@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:43:13 -0400
Subject: Cleanup pass

Pass to do some cleanups
---
 src/main/java/bjc/data/GeneratingIterator.java | 27 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/main/java/bjc/data/GeneratingIterator.java')

diff --git a/src/main/java/bjc/data/GeneratingIterator.java b/src/main/java/bjc/data/GeneratingIterator.java
index 9adda6f..ffa92cf 100644
--- a/src/main/java/bjc/data/GeneratingIterator.java
+++ b/src/main/java/bjc/data/GeneratingIterator.java
@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ import java.util.function.UnaryOperator;
 
 /**
  * An iterator that generates a series of elements from a single element.
- * 
+ *
  * @author bjculkin
  *
  * @param <E>
- *        The type of element generated.
+ *            The type of element generated.
  */
 public class GeneratingIterator<E> implements Iterator<E> {
 	/* Our current state. */
@@ -22,18 +22,19 @@ public class GeneratingIterator<E> implements Iterator<E> {
 
 	/**
 	 * Create a new generative iterator.
-	 * 
+	 *
 	 * @param initial
-	 *        The initial state of the generator.
-	 * 
+	 *                   The initial state of the generator.
+	 *
 	 * @param transition
-	 *        The function to apply to the state.
-	 * 
+	 *                   The function to apply to the state.
+	 *
 	 * @param stopper
-	 *        The predicate applied to the current state to determine when
-	 *        to stop.
+	 *                   The predicate applied to the current state to determine
+	 *                   when to stop.
 	 */
-	public GeneratingIterator(E initial, UnaryOperator<E> transition, Predicate<E> stopper) {
+	public GeneratingIterator(E initial, UnaryOperator<E> transition,
+			Predicate<E> stopper) {
 		state = initial;
 		transtion = transition;
 		stpper = stopper;
@@ -47,9 +48,9 @@ public class GeneratingIterator<E> implements Iterator<E> {
 	/*
 	 * @NOTE
 	 *
-	 * As this currently is, it only works correctly assuming that next() is
-	 * only called when hasNext() is true. Should we safeguard against
-	 * people who are not doing the right thing?
+	 * As this currently is, it only works correctly assuming that next() is only
+	 * called when hasNext() is true. Should we safeguard against people who are not
+	 * doing the right thing?
 	 */
 	@Override
 	public E next() {
-- 
cgit v1.2.3